Rahim Safavi: War outcome will benefit Iran and resistance axis

Iranian Armed Forces Chief of Staff Adviser Rahim Safavi commented in an interview with Al Mayadeen on regional developments, including Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Iran, describing them as interconnected. In the same interview, he said the outcome of the regional conflicts would be in Iran’s and the Axis of Resistance’s favor. Safavi also said the Zionist regime has been the main source of instability, wars, and conflicts in the region over the past eight decades and is the chief culprit behind the current escalation of tensions.

• In all coverage, the speaker is identified as Rahim Safavi and his title is given as “Adviser to the Commander-in-Chief of the Iranian Armed Forces.”
• All the listed media outlets published the news with an almost identical headline, centering the story on Safavi’s prediction about the outcome of the conflicts.
• In his interview with Al Mayadeen, Safavi described developments in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Iran as interconnected.
• He said the outcome of the regional conflicts would be in Iran’s and the Axis of Resistance’s favor.
• In the narratives of ISNA, Khabar Fori, and Rooydad24, the main thrust of the story focuses on Safavi’s assessment of the outcome of the war.
• The texts published by ISNA and Khabar Fori prominently featured the headline “The outcome of the war will be in Iran’s and the Axis of Resistance’s favor.”
• Rooydad24 also used the same headline, but in one version shortened the phrase “Adviser to the Commander-in-Chief of the Iranian Armed Forces” to “Adviser to the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces” instead of “Adviser to the Commander-in-Chief of the Iranian Armed Forces.”
• In its Telegram version, ISNA, in addition to linking regional developments together, quoted Safavi as saying the Zionist regime was the main source of instability, wars, and conflicts in the region.
• The same attribution of responsibility to the Zionist regime was repeated in the other listed reports.
• None of the submitted texts mention the exact time of the interview or provide further details about the interview context.. Coverage difference: In ISNA’s coverage, both the Telegram version and the main version, in addition to Safavi’s prediction about the outcome of the conflicts, also refer to his statement about the interconnectedness of regional developments and his attribution of eight decades of instability to the Zionist regime. Khabar Fori and Rooydad24 reflected the same news framework with a similar headline, and their main difference lies more in the form and length of presentation than in the substance of the quoted content. In all sources, the narrative is the same, and no specific numerical or substantive discrepancies are evident among them.